HS First Year English ( Snapshots) Chapter-8 The Tale of Melon City

HS First Year English ( Snapshots) Chapter-8 The Tale of Melon City. Important questions for HS First Year English Questions Answers brings you latest queries and solutions with accordance to the most recent pointers NCERT. Students will clear all their doubts with regard to every chapter by active these necessary chapter queries and elaborate explanations that area unit provided by our specialists so as to assist you higher. These queries can facilitate students prepare well for the exams thanks to time constraint. HS First Year English ( Snapshots) Chapter-8 The Tale of Melon City

HS First Year English ( Snapshots) Chapter-8 The Tale of Melon City

Text Book Exercises

Q.1. Narrate ‘The Tale of Melon City’ in your own words. 

Ans. The poem ‘The Tale of Melon City’ is the story of a moody and whimsical king. He ordered an arch to be constructed. The arch was built too low. When the king was under it, his crown was banged off. The king became angry. He ordered the chief of builders to be hanged for that disgrace. But the chief put the blame on the workmen. The just king ordered the workmen to be hanged. But the workmen blamed the wrong size and shape of the bricks for this incident. Mason pleaded innocence and blamed the architect. But the architect said that the king himself had made some amendments in the plan of the arch. Now the king was confused. So he needed counsel to solve this tricky issue. The wisest man in the kingdom tol that the arch itself was guilty. Because it banged the crown off the king and it must be hanged. The arch was brought to the scaffold. But a counsellor urged the king that it would be shameful to hang somebody who had touched the royal head.

The people were watching the whole drama. They became restless. The king judged the mood of the public. He declared that someone would be hanged immediately. The noose was set up. Everyone was measured by and by. Only one man was tall where neck fitted in the noose was the king himself. His majesty was hanged by a Royal Decree. The Ministers exclaimed that the next to pass the city Gate would choose the new king. An idiot passed first by the city Gate. He chose a melon to be the next king of the state. The melon was crowned as the next king with great respect and ceremony. 

Q.2. What impression would you form of a state where the king was ‘just and placid’?

Ans. The poem satirises how a ‘just’ and ‘placid’ king ruled his state. The king has been described as a ‘just’ and ‘placid’ king. He lived in a fool’s paradise. He could not take an independent decision, Perhaps he was too good to be of any use to his state and the people. He was whimsical and fickle-minded.

One can imagine the state of such a kingdom. The king was so ‘just’ that he could do no justice. He changed his decisions. He is swayed by the moods of the people. He can be easily convinced. In such a state anyone can meet the unexpected end. Be it the king himself. He judges the mood of the people. The king is hanged to death by his own decree. The Ministers and the people only thank God. At least someone came forward to be hanged. It made no difference to them if their king was a man or a melon.

Q. 3. How, according to you, can peace and liberty be maintained in a state?

Ans. A state needs peace and liberty to grow more properly. The man who rules the state must understand the problem and needs of the people. But ironically, most of the states are being ruled by melon kings.

Only a judicious and powerful ruler can bring peace and liberty. But ironically, the state here possesses a king who has no personality and is thinking of his own. He is swayed away by the moods of the people. The king invites his own death to meet the ends of justice. A foolish and idiotic king is nothing more than a melon. People don’t care. They want to live in peace and liberty.

Q.4. Suggest a few instances in the poem which highlight humour and irony.

Ans. Vikram Seth’s poem ‘The Tale of Melon City’ is full of humour and irony. The very opening of the poem is ironic. There was a just and placid king. The just king was too good to be of any use to himself or the people. His sense of justice brought his own death. Everything sounds ironic. Another humorous thing is that the ‘placid’ king gets agitated on a small issue. It is quite humorous how easily the king lets himself be fooled by others. From the chief of builders to the architect everyone blames and responsibility on others.

The most humourous and ridiculous instances come when the arch is brought to the scaffold to be hanged. Fantastic! only an idiot king could have agreed to such a thing..

The tragic irony in the poem is the death of the king himself. It is the demand of the people that someone will be hanged. The king is hanged to death by his own decree. The crowning of a melon may express absurd. But it carries a message. The people are completely disillusioned. That it matters little to them if they are ruled by humans or a melon. Only their interests should be saved and not interfered with.

Additional Short Answer Type Questions

Q.1. The king was a ‘just’ and ‘placid’ king, says the poet, was he so? 

Ans. The king of melon city has been defined as ‘just’. He was ready to hang anyone who could be blamed for the mishap. He was whimsical and easily influenced. His exaggerated sense of justice caused even his own death. He was called ‘placid’ but lost his temper over a small incident. Actually, the king was too good to be of any use. Q.2. Why did he proclaim an arch to be constructed? Ans. The king proclaimed an arch to be constructed. The arch should be a symbol of his triumph a sort of victory. He wanted the arch to be extended across the major thoroughfare of the city. It was made so grand as to ‘edify spectators there. The king himself rode majestically to urge others to follow him. 

Q.3. Describe the mishap that took place as the king rode under the roof. 

Ans. The king rode under the arch. The arch was built too low. When the king rode under it, the arch banged his crown off. The incident upset the placid king. Signs of anger appeared on his face. He considered it quite a disgraceful act.

Q.4. How did the chief of builders save himself?

Ans. The chief of builders was summoned. The king held him responsible for the mishap. The rope and gallows were arranged. He was to be hanged. But the chief pleaded that he was innocent and it was the fault of the workmen. Actually, they built the arch. “

Q.5. How did the workmen save themselves?,

Ans. The workmen were summoned to be hanged because they built the arch with their hands. But they pleaded the king that the bricks were made of the wrong size. The masons were responsible for this mishap. 

Q.6. Whom did the Masons blame for the mishap? How did the architect defend himself?

Ans. The Masons saved their lives by convincing the king that they were innocent. They blamed the architect who planned the arch. The architect was summoned to be hanged. The poor architect reminded the king that he had suggested certain amendments in the plan. Hence he was innocent.

Q.7. What did the wisest man counsel? 

Ans. The wisest man of the kingdom was called to counsel and guide the king to solve the tricky issue. The old wisemen replied in a trembling way that “The culprit must be punished’. Actually it was the arch that bange the crown off. Hence, it must be hanged.

Q.8. Why did the king call the issue “a tricky thing”?

Ans. Someone was to be hanged. The question was who should be brought to the scaffold. From the chief of builders to the architect everyone could convince the king of their innocence. The king was confused. He needs! some counsel to solve the tricky issue. He was to ascertain who was responsible for the faulty construction of the arch?

Q.9. How was the king hanged by his own ‘Royal Decree’? 

Ans. The noose was set up somewhat high. Each man was measured by and by. Unfortunately, no one came up to the noose. There was only one man who was so tall that his neck could fit in the noose perfectly. And he was the king himself. Therefore, His Majesty’ himself was hanged by the Royal Decree.

Q.10. What was the procedure that was followed to choose the new king?

Ans. Anyone who first passed the city gate would choose the next king. An idiot passed through the gate. The guard stopped him. The guards pressed him to choose the next king of their state.

Q.11. Justify the title of the poem. 

Ans. The title of ‘The Tale of Melon City’ is quite logical. The city is ruled by a whimsical and idiotic king. He is ironically called ‘just’ and placid”. In reality he is neither. His substitute is a melon. It doesn’t make any difference to the people. Being ruled by a melon king or the idiotic king amounts to the same thing.

Q.12. Describe the humour and irony in the poem. 

Ans. The very title is humorous. A melon is crowned as a king. The king is just and ‘placid’ quite ironical. His sense of justice can send anyone to the gallows. He falls into his own trap. The most humorous as well as ridiculous act was the idea of bringing the arch to the scaffold. A melon could only be the right substitute for such a whimsical and idiotic king.

Long Answer Type Question

Q. 1. Draw a character sketch of the king as described in ‘The Tele of Melon City.’

Ans. The king in Vikram Seth’s “The Tale of Melon City” is a unique personality. He is not guided by logic and reason. The king is ‘just’ and placid’. The use of such adjectives is ironical. Actually, he is neither of the two. He can’t do justice. He has his limitations. The king is easily influenced and convinced. He is spineless and fickle minded. He orders an arch to be constructed as a triumph of his glory and victory. The arch was built too low. As the king rode under it, the arch banged off his crown. He orders everyone to be hanged whom he thinks to be responsible for the faulty arch.

The king is weak and bends under the pressure of the people. The king is hanged by his own decree. The people don’t care if they are ruled by a man king or a melon king. From all this it is clear that the king is a foolish and idiot person.

HORNBILL PROSE & POETRY

Sl. No.LessonLink
1The Portrait of a LadyClick here
2A PhotographClick here
3“We’re Not Afraid to Die…
If We Can All Be Together”
Click here
4Discovering Tut: The Saga ContinuesClick here
5The Laburnum TopClick here
6Landscape of the soulClick here
7The Voice of the RainClick here
8The Ailing planet:
The Green Movement’s Role
Click here
9The Browning VersionClick here
10ChildhoodClick here
11The AdventureClick here
12Silk RoadClick here
13My Impressions of AssamClick here
14Father to SonClick here

SNAPSHOTS

Sl. No.LessonLink
1The Summer of the Beautiful White HorseClick here
2The AddressClick here
3Ranga’s MarriageClick here
4Albert Einstein at SchoolClick here
5Mother’s DayClick here
6The Ghat of the Only WorldClick here
7BirthClick here
8The Tale of Melon CityClick here

Summary of the lesson

1. There was a king. Vikram Seth ironically calls him ‘peaceful and placid’. Actually, he was neither of the two. He was whimsical and moody, He was unstable. He was swayed by the mood of the people.

2. The king issued a proclamation. An arch should be constructed. It should serve as an entrance and a symbol of his triumphs. The great arch must extend across the thoroughfare of the city. The sight of the grand arch should inspire and motivate people and spectators there. 

3. The workmen worked accordingly. The king rode down the thoroughfare to motivate others to follow him. The earth was too low-Under the arch, the crown of the king was banged off.

4. Signs of anger appeared on the calm face of the king. He was agitated. The act was just a disgrace. He ordered that the chief of builders would be hanged. The chief pleaded that it was the workmen’s fault. The king ordered all workmen to be hanged. They pleaded that it was not their fault. The bricks were not of proper shape and size. The king easily convinced. He summoned the masons who made these bricks. The mason turned the responsibility on the architect. Now the architect was to be hanged. He had urged the king to make certain amendments in the plan.

(5) The king realised that the whole issue was tricky. He needed counsel. The wisest man was found and brought to the Royal Court. He declared that the arch itself was the culprit. It banged the crown off, so it must be hanged. Then a counsellor gave a new twist to the whole drama. He argued how a thing that touched the royal head could be hanged. The king agreed.

(6) The king judged the mood of the people. He declared that ‘the nation wants a hanging’. Someone must be hanged immediately. A noose was set up somewhat high. Each man was measured by and by, The king himself could fit in the noose. His Majesty therefore, hanged by the Royal Decree.

(7) The ministers had to choose a new king now. They declared that the first to pass the city gate would choose the next king of the state. 

(8) A idiot, who passed the gate, chose a melon to be the king of the state.

(9) People placed a melan and crowned it as the neat king.

(10) At last, the melon king wouldn’t interfere in their affairs. He would let them live in peace and liberty.

This Post Has 7 Comments

Leave a Reply